18 companies account for half of the S&P carbon emissions

No Emission Policies

Emissions Policies

No Specific Reduction Targets

Specific Reduction Targets

Non-Compliant

Comply with U.S. Paris Agreement Pledge

Possibly Compliant, but Lack Standardized Targets

Non-Compliant

Comply with EU Paris Agreement Pledge

Possibly Compliant, but Lack Standardized Targets

44 companies account for 28% of the S&P’s carbon emissions

The CO2 Bubble

Visualizing carbon emissions and climate activism of every S&P 500 corporation

For shareholders, betting on big greenhouse gas emitters has become a greater financial risk. As renewables become cheaper, some corporations are quickly reducing or outright eliminating emissions. Others have done little to relinquish their dependence on fossil fuels.

Transparent, standardized Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data can help investors understand which companies are advancing toward environmental and economic sustainability, and which aren’t.

Later, we’ll show you how fossil fuel divestment affects S&P returns in historical backtesting.

For our study, we sampled the 500 largest corporations listed on the New York Stock Exchange — a.k.a. the S&P 500. The operation of these 500 companies accounts for over 2.1 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions per year, which is roughly 32% of all US greenhouse gas emissions. The entire Amazon Rainforest absorbs 2.2 billion tonnes of CO2 per year.

An important caveat: This doesn’t include emissions passed onto consumers (i.e., If you buy gas from a Chevron gas station, your car’s emissions don’t count toward Chevron’s CO2 emissions here). Instead, we are focusing on emissions from operations, like extracting and transporting petroleum, which in Chevron’s case represents just 15.15% of total direct and indirect emissions.

The bulk of emissions come from just a few corporations.

No S&P company is carbon-zero yet, but a few are close in operating emissions. Conversely, just 18 companies account for half of the 2.1 billion tonnes of operating CO2 that the S&P generates.

No surprise: The biggest greenhouse gas emitters are fossil fuel, transport, petrochemical, and utility companies.

That’s the present situation. But we can also look into the future and see whether these companies are committed to changing course to address climate change.

Just 60% of the S&P 500 has committed to reducing CO2 levels.

For starters, if companies are serious about confronting climate change, they should have an emissions policy in place. These policies are published in annual ESG statements and include a non-binding pledge to confront climate change by reducing emissions. 354 S&P companies have emissions policies.

That’s an important step, but not all climate goals are equally bold and emissions policies are non-binding. An emissions policy doesn’t hold you accountable to specific actions—unless it includes reduction targets.

245 S&P companies with emissions policies have committed to specific reduction targets.

Paris Agreement benchmarks show who's serious and who's falling behind.

The Paris Agreement compels countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by self-determined targets aimed at averting a catastrophic 1.5 degree celsius rise in global temperature

Before the United States withdrew from the Paris Agreement in 2017, the country set a target of 17% reduction by 2020 and 80% reduction by 2050 (relative to 2005).

The European Union set even more aggressive targets: a 40% reduction by 2020, and a 85% reduction by 2050 (relative to 2005). The EU targets align more closely with what scientific consensus urges as obligatory to curb runaway rising temperatures.

Just 85 S&P companies are currently on track with the US’s Paris Agreement pledge.

And only 44 S&P companies are currently on track with the EU’s Paris Agreement pledge.

Incredibly, those 44 companies hitting the EU’s high threshold account for 28% of the S&P’s carbon emissions. This includes many major utility companies, whose emission reductions will have a much bigger impact.

S&P 500

Divestment from CO2 is better for our climate—and S&P investment returns.

As a stockholder, you can influence corporate climate policy by investing in sustainable stocks and by reconsidering investments in unsustainable ones.

Below, we show you how the S&P would have performed between 2005 and 2019 had you excluded high-carbon-emitting, low-carbon-reducing companies in industries like oil and gas, petrochemicals, and electric utility.

The results may surprise you.

Sustainable Investment Calculator

Tap to exclude S&P 500's biggest carbon emitters

S&P 500
Exclude Energy
Exclude Energy & Materials
Exclude Energy & Utilities*
Exclude Energy, Utilities* & Materials

reduction in total S&P emissions

19.20%

annualized returns

9.85%

*vs. S&P returns of 9.54%

reduction in total S&P emissions

30.11%

annualized returns

9.87%

*vs. S&P returns of 9.54%

reduction in total S&P emissions

32.17%

*This only includes Utility companies that aren't compliant with EU Paris targets

annualized returns

9.84%

*vs. S&P returns of 9.54%

reduction in total S&P emissions

43.08%

*This only includes Utility companies that aren't compliant with EU Paris targets

annualized returns

9.87%

*vs. S&P returns of 9.54%

Ultimately, while past performance isn’t indicative of future results, you can dramatically reduce a portfolio’s carbon footprint without affecting historical returns.

S&P Returns vs.
S&P Returns Excluding High CO2 Emitters

Annualized 2005-2019

*This only includes Utility companies that aren't compliant with EU Paris targets

Build sustainability into your investment strategies with Refinitiv’s ESG data and services, covering 70% of global market cap.